Sender: DocsUpdates-owner@docmelson.com
X-RCPT-TO: <Will@willpete.com>
Friday, Sept. 28, 2001
Armed Citizens the Best Defense Against Terrorists
Ordinary
responsible Americans need to be armed, just as Israelis are, in the war
against terrorism, writes author/researcher John R. Lott Jr., who says that's
the only adequate response to the terrorist threat Americans now face.
Writing in
today's Wall Street Journal, Lott notes the security problems the nation faces
and insists that no matter how tight restrictions are, and no matter how many
air marshals ride planes, nothing beats having an armed citizenry in the fight
against terrorism.
Lott, a
resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and author of "More
Guns, Less Crime" (University of Chicago Press, 2000), itemizes the flaws in
most of the security measures now in effect or being considered:
·
Screening at airports, while
important, will always be inadequate, he writes, noting that terrorists can
always find some way around the controls, such as bribing airport employees.
·
Strengthening cockpit doors,
he says, is probably a good idea, "but given current airline design it may
create dangerous differences in air pressure between the cockpit and cabin. In
any case, the door must be opened sometime, to allow pilots to go to the
bathroom or get food."
·
The marshals program is more
promising. He cites research by Bill Landes at the University of Chicago that
showed that between a third and a half of the drop in airplane hijackings
during the 1970s were the probable result of having armed U.S. marshals on
planes as well as law enforcement's increased ability to catch and punish
hijackers.
·
Putting merely one air
marshal aboard every daily flight in the U.S. would require an army of at
least 35,000 officers - a far greater number than total of all those who now
work for the FBI, Secret Service and the U.S. Marshal Service combined
(17,000). Moreover, he adds, one marshal might not be enough to foil a whole
gang of hijackers of the kind used by Osama bin Laden. Clearly, he says, it
will take a long time to deploy enough marshals.
In response
to these and other problems, Lott suggests that the 600,000 active state and
local law enforcement officers in the U.S. today who are currently forbidden
to bring their guns on airplanes should not only be allowed to board planes
but even be given discount fares if they fly with their guns. Moreover, since
most pilots have also had military experience, they should be armed, as their
union and NewsMax.com's Chris Ruddy have demanded, exactly as Israel's El Al
has been doing all along.
Lott
dismisses fears of having guns aboard planes, explaining that the special
high-velocity handgun ammunition used on planes packs quite a wallop but is
designed not to penetrate the aluminum skin of the plane. Even with regular
bullets, he notes, the worst-case outcome would simply be to force the plane
to fly at a lower altitude, where the air pressure is higher.
But using
guns to stop terrorists shouldn't be limited to airplanes, he insists. "We
should encourage off-duty police, and responsible citizens, to carry guns in
most public places, because cops can't be everywhere."
In Israel,
for example, Lott explains that about 10 percent of Jewish adults have permits
to carry concealed handguns. Just to match that rate of permit holding,
Americans would have to increase the number of permits from 3.5 million to
almost 21 million, he writes.
"Thirty-three states currently have 'right-to-carry' laws, which allow the
law-abiding to obtain a permit if they are above a certain age and pay a fee.
Half of these states require some training. We should encourage more states to
pass such laws, and possibly even subsidize firearms training," Lott
maintains.
He concludes
by noting that the states that do pass concealed handgun laws "experience
drops in violent crimes, especially in multiple-victim shootings - the type of
attack most associated with terrorism.
"Bill Landes
and I found that deaths and injuries from multiple-victim public shootings
fell by 80 percent after states passed right-to-carry laws."
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Guns/Gun Control
War on Terrorism
"When the
way comes to an end, then change - having changed, you pass through."
I. Ching
Bruce "Doc". Melson
http://www.docmelson.com/MedicsPlace/index.htm